Yes, an abstract class can have a constructor. Consider this:
abstract class Product { int multiplyBy; public Product( int multiplyBy ) { this.multiplyBy = multiplyBy; } public int mutiply(int val) { return multiplyBy * val; } } class TimesTwo extends Product { public TimesTwo() { super(2); } } class TimesWhat extends Product { public TimesWhat(int what) { super(what); } }
The superclass Product
is abstract and has a constructor. The concrete class TimesTwo
has a constructor that just hardcodes the value 2. The concrete class TimesWhat
has a constructor that allows the caller to specify the value.
Abstract constructors will frequently be used to enforce class constraints or invariants such as the minimum fields required to setup the class.
NOTE: As there is no default (or no-arg) constructor in the parent abstract class, the constructor used in subclass must explicitly call the parent constructor.