EDIT Since c++17, some parts of the standard library were removed. Fortunately, starting with c++11, we have lambdas which are a superior solution.
#include <algorithm> #include <cctype> #include <locale> // trim from start (in place) static inline void ltrim(std::string &s) { s.erase(s.begin(), std::find_if(s.begin(), s.end(), [](unsigned char ch) { return !std::isspace(ch); })); } // trim from end (in place) static inline void rtrim(std::string &s) { s.erase(std::find_if(s.rbegin(), s.rend(), [](unsigned char ch) { return !std::isspace(ch); }).base(), s.end()); } // trim from both ends (in place) static inline void trim(std::string &s) { ltrim(s); rtrim(s); } // trim from start (copying) static inline std::string ltrim_copy(std::string s) { ltrim(s); return s; } // trim from end (copying) static inline std::string rtrim_copy(std::string s) { rtrim(s); return s; } // trim from both ends (copying) static inline std::string trim_copy(std::string s) { trim(s); return s; }
Thanks to https://stackoverflow.com/a/44973498/524503 for bringing up the modern solution.
Original answer:
I tend to use one of these 3 for my trimming needs:
#include <algorithm> #include <functional> #include <cctype> #include <locale> // trim from start static inline std::string <rim(std::string &s) { s.erase(s.begin(), std::find_if(s.begin(), s.end(), std::not1(std::ptr_fun<int, int>(std::isspace)))); return s; } // trim from end static inline std::string &rtrim(std::string &s) { s.erase(std::find_if(s.rbegin(), s.rend(), std::not1(std::ptr_fun<int, int>(std::isspace))).base(), s.end()); return s; } // trim from both ends static inline std::string &trim(std::string &s) { return ltrim(rtrim(s)); }
They are fairly self-explanatory and work very well.
EDIT: BTW, I have std::ptr_fun
in there to help disambiguate std::isspace
because there is actually a second definition which supports locales. This could have been a cast just the same, but I tend to like this better.
EDIT: To address some comments about accepting a parameter by reference, modifying and returning it. I Agree. An implementation that I would likely prefer would be two sets of functions, one for in place and one which makes a copy. A better set of examples would be:
#include <algorithm> #include <functional> #include <cctype> #include <locale> // trim from start (in place) static inline void ltrim(std::string &s) { s.erase(s.begin(), std::find_if(s.begin(), s.end(), std::not1(std::ptr_fun<int, int>(std::isspace)))); } // trim from end (in place) static inline void rtrim(std::string &s) { s.erase(std::find_if(s.rbegin(), s.rend(), std::not1(std::ptr_fun<int, int>(std::isspace))).base(), s.end()); } // trim from both ends (in place) static inline void trim(std::string &s) { ltrim(s); rtrim(s); } // trim from start (copying) static inline std::string ltrim_copy(std::string s) { ltrim(s); return s; } // trim from end (copying) static inline std::string rtrim_copy(std::string s) { rtrim(s); return s; } // trim from both ends (copying) static inline std::string trim_copy(std::string s) { trim(s); return s; }
I am keeping the original answer above though for context and in the interest of keeping the high voted answer still available.