pythonw.exe or python.exe?
If you don’t want a terminal window to pop up when you run your program, use pythonw.exe;Otherwise, use python.exe Regarding the syntax error: print is now a function in 3.xSo use instead:
If you don’t want a terminal window to pop up when you run your program, use pythonw.exe;Otherwise, use python.exe Regarding the syntax error: print is now a function in 3.xSo use instead:
Updating youtube-dl helped me. Depending on the way you installed it, here are the commands: youtube-dl –update (self-update) pip install -U youtube-dl (via python) brew upgrade youtube-dl (macOS + homebrew) choco upgrade youtube-dl (Windows + Chocolatey)
In Python 3, map returns an iterable object of type map, and not a subscriptible list, which would allow you to write map[i]. To force a list result, write However, in many cases, you can write out your code way nicer by not using indices. For example, with list comprehensions:
As you’re using Python 3, there is no urllib module anymore. It has been split into several modules. This would be equivalent to urlretrieve: urlretrieve behaves exactly the same way as it did in Python 2.x, so it’ll work just fine. Basically: urlretrieve saves the file to a temporary file and returns a tuple (filename, … Read more
You need to download Python from https://python.org. When in the installation, be sure to check the option that adds Python to PATH.
There is no python3.exe file, that is why it fails. Try: py instead. py is just a launcher for python.exe. If you have more than one python versions installed on your machine (2.x, 3.x) you can specify what version of python to launch by py -2 or py -3
I fixed my issue by… downloading Python 3 at the official website and installing it via express installation Copy & Paste the standalone python into the ampps/python folder and overwriting the python version provided by AMPPS running python -m pip install –upgrade pip in cmd Now pip and python 3 are installed in their latest version. It … Read more
This question is old but as it comes up high on search results I will point out that scipy has two functions for computing the binomial coefficients: scipy.special.binom() scipy.special.comb()import scipy.special # the two give the same results scipy.special.binom(10, 5) # 252.0 scipy.special.comb(10, 5) # 252.0 scipy.special.binom(300, 150) # 9.375970277281882e+88 scipy.special.comb(300, 150) # 9.375970277281882e+88 # …but with `exact … Read more
Taking advantage of str.split’s behavior with no sep parameter: If you just want to remove spaces instead of all whitespace: Premature optimization Even though efficiency isn’t the primary goal—writing clear code is—here are some initial timings: Note the regex is cached, so it’s not as slow as you’d imagine. Compiling it beforehand helps some, but … Read more
Clearly you’re passing in d.keys() to your shuffle function. Probably this was written with python2.x (when d.keys() returned a list). With python3.x, d.keys() returns a dict_keys object which behaves a lot more like a set than a list. As such, it can’t be indexed. The solution is to pass list(d.keys()) (or simply list(d)) to shuffle.