“The public type <> must be defined in its own file” error in Eclipse [duplicate]

If .java file contains top level (not nested) public class, it has to have the same name as that public class. So if you have class like public class A{...} it needs to be placed in A.java file. Because of that we can’t have two public classes in one .java file.

If having two public classes would be allowed then, and lets say aside from public A class file would also contain public class B{} it would require from A.java file to be also named as B.java but files can’t have two (or more) names (at least in all systems on which Java can be run).

So assuming your code is placed in StaticDemoShow.java file you have two options:

  1. If you want to have other class in same file make them non-public (lack of visibility modifier will represent default/package-private visibility) class StaticDemo { // It can no longer public static int a = 3; static int b = 4; static { System.out.println("Voila! Static block put into action"); } static void show() { System.out.println("a= " + a); System.out.println("b= " + b); } } public class StaticDemoShow { // Only one top level public class in same .java file public static void main() { StaticDemo.show(); } }
  2. Move all public classes to their own .java files. So in your case you would need to split it into two files:
    • StaticDemo.java public class StaticDemo { // Note: same name as name of file static int a = 3; static int b = 4; static { System.out.println("Voila! Static block put into action"); } static void show() { System.out.println("a= " + a); System.out.println("b= " + b); } }
    • StaticDemoShow.java public class StaticDemoShow { public static void main() { StaticDemo.show(); } }

Leave a Comment