There are three ways to pass a 2D array to a function: The parameter is a 2D arrayint array[10][10]; void passFunc(int a[][10]) { // … } passFunc(array); The parameter is an array containing pointersint *array[10]; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) array[i] = new int[10]; void passFunc(int *a[10]) //Array containing pointers { // … Read more
Array in C++ must have a size defined at compile-time. If you want variable length array, use std::vector instead. In your case, I would use template for Matrix Size and have different implementation for different matrix size (unless I misunderstood your intentions). Since I did not defined the generic template, using any other value than 2 or … Read more
A pattern that often came up in Python was which helped motivate the introduction of list comprehensions, which convert that snippet to which is shorter and sometimes clearer. Usually, you get in the habit of recognizing these and often replacing loops with comprehensions. Your code follows this pattern twice
A pattern that often came up in Python was which helped motivate the introduction of list comprehensions, which convert that snippet to which is shorter and sometimes clearer. Usually you get in the habit of recognizing these and often replacing loops with comprehensions. Your code follows this pattern twice
Non-numpy way: Use collections.Counter;
If your row length is a compile time constant, C++11 allows See this answer. Compilers like gcc that allow variable-length arrays as an extension to C++ can use new as shown here to get fully runtime-variable array dimension functionality like C99 allows, but portable ISO C++ is limited to only the first dimension being variable. Another efficient option is … Read more
What you are doing is printing the value in the array at spot [3][3], which is invalid for a 3by3 array, you need to loop over all the spots and print them. This will print it in the following format if you want more exact formatting you’ll have to change how the printf is formatted.
http://jsfiddle.net/z4Un3/ And if you’re wanting to store DOM elements: Not real sure how useful the above is until you attach the elements. The below may be more what you’re looking for: http://jsfiddle.net/z4Un3/3/ Or, maybe this: Which gives: In the console. If you want to output that to text, you can result.join(‘ ‘);, which would give you 2 … Read more