TypeError: ‘float’ object not iterable
for i in count: means for i in 7:, which won’t work. The bit after the in should be of an iterable type, not a number. Try this:
for i in count: means for i in 7:, which won’t work. The bit after the in should be of an iterable type, not a number. Try this:
For next examples assumed that you use C++11. Example with ranged-based for loops: You should use const auto &attack depending on the behavior of makeDamage(). You can use std::for_each from standard library + lambdas: If you are uncomfortable using std::for_each, you can loop over m_attack using iterators: Use m_attack.cbegin() and m_attack.cend() to get const iterators.
Is there any reason I don’t see this in C++? Is it bad practice? No. It is not a bad practice, but the following approach renders your code certain flexibility. Usually, pre-C++11 the code for iterating over container elements uses iterators, something like: This is because it makes the code more flexible. All standard library … Read more
Is there any reason I don’t see this in C++? Is it bad practice? No. It is not a bad practice, but the following approach renders your code certain flexibility. Usually, pre-C++11 the code for iterating over container elements uses iterators, something like: This is because it makes the code more flexible. All standard library … Read more
++i will increment the value of i, and then return the incremented value. i = 1; j = ++i; (i is 2, j is 2) i++ will increment the value of i, but return the original value that i held before being incremented. i = 1; j = i++; (i is 2, j is 1) For a for loop, either works. ++i seems more common, … Read more
Three main options: for (var i = 0; i < xs.length; i++) { console.log(xs[i]); } xs.forEach((x, i) => console.log(x)); for (const x of xs) { console.log(x); } Detailed examples are below. 1. Sequential for loop: Run code snippet Pros Works on every environment You can use break and continue flow control statements Cons Too verbose Imperative Easy to have off-by-one errors (sometimes also … Read more
Yes, assuming your implementation includes the for…of feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (the “Harmony” release)… which is a pretty safe assumption these days. It works like this: Or better yet, since ECMAScript 2015 also provides block-scoped variables: (The variable s is different on each iteration, but can still be declared const inside the loop body as long as it isn’t modified there.) A … Read more
++i will increment the value of i, and then return the incremented value. i = 1; j = ++i; (i is 2, j is 2) i++ will increment the value of i, but return the original value that i held before being incremented. i = 1; j = i++; (i is 2, j is 1) … Read more
The better practice is to use for-each. Besides violating the Keep It Simple, Stupid principle, the new-fangled forEach() has at least the following deficiencies: Can’t use non-final variables. So, code like the following can’t be turned into a forEach lambda: Can’t handle checked exceptions. Lambdas aren’t actually forbidden from throwing checked exceptions, but common functional … Read more
The current answers are good, but do not talk about how they are just syntactic sugar to some pattern that we are so used to. Let’s start with an example, say we have 10 numbers, and we want a subset of those that are greater than, say, 5. For the above task, the below approaches … Read more